Documentation
This validation case belongs to solid mechanics. It aims to validate the following parameters:
The simulation results of SimScale were compared to the reference values presented in [SSNP123]\(^1\).
Find below the notched plate geometry used for this validation case:
The plate dimensions are tabulated below:
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
| x | 0 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0 | 0 |
| y | 0 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| z | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 |
The corresponding nodes marked with an apostrophe (‘) are translated 0.0001 \(m\) along the negative z-direction.
Tool Type: Code_Aster
Analysis Type: Nonlinear static
Mesh and Element Types: The meshes used in this project were created in SimScale with the standard algorithm.
| Case | Element Type | Number of Nodes | Element Technology |
| (A) | 2nd Order Tetrahedral | 44211 | Standard |
| (B) | 2nd Order Tetrahedral | 44211 | Reduced integration |
Find below the mesh used for cases A and B. It’s a standard mesh with second-order tetrahedral cells.
Material:

Boundary Conditions:
The results obtained from SimScale for the Cauchy stress \(\sigma_{yy}\) along the FC line are compared to the values of reference from [SSNP123]\(^1\). These values of reference were extracted with WebPlotDigitizer. Figure 5 shows the results for case A, where element technology is set to standard:
Similarly, for case B, where reduced integration was used:
In both Figures 5 and 6, SimScale’s results show good agreement with the reference values.
Inspecting the Cauchy stress \(\sigma_{yy}\) for case B in the post-processor:
Last updated: November 7th, 2023
We appreciate and value your feedback.
Subscribe to our newsletter
By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy
Product
Solutions
Resources
Sign up for SimScale
and start simulating now