The mean age of air in a room validation case belongs to fluid dynamics. This test case aims to validate the following:
Age of air using the passive scalar transport model
Scalar mixing distribution
In this project, the age of air within a room is calculated. The SimScale results are compared to the experimental results reported by Martin et. al\(^1\).
The geometry consists of a rectangular room with one inlet and one outlet, as in Figure 1:
Figure 1: Dimensions of the room for the age of air validation study
The center points of the inlet and outlet are placed at y = 1.8 meters. Details of the room dimensions are provided in Table 1:
Part
Length in x-direction \([m]\)
Length in y-direction \([m]\)
Length in z-direction \([m]\)
Inlet
1.92
0.30
0.20
Outlet
0.20
0.30
1.92
Room
4.20
3.60
3.00
Table 1: Dimensions of the sections of the room
In the reference study, the outlet is described to be “on the ceiling, close to the east wall (opposite to the air supply)”, however, no exact placement is given. Based on the description and the schematics of the experimental setup, a gap of 0.1 meters is assumed between the outlet and the wall opposite to the air supply:
Figure 2: Placement of the outlet, based on the schematics of the reference study
Note
By extruding the inlet and outlet sufficiently, we can allow the flow field to develop in these sections. In this case study, the inlet and outlet are extruded by a length equal to 8 times their hydraulic diameter \(D_h\). $$D_h = \frac {4A}{P} \tag{1}$$ In the formula above, \(A\) is the cross-section area and \(P\) is the wetted perimeter. In our case, the hydraulic diameter for the inlet and outlet is 0.24 meters.
Mesh and Element Types: This validation case uses a total of 3 meshes to perform a mesh independence study. All meshes were created in SimScale with the Standard mesher algorithm. In Table 2, an overview of them is presented:
Mesh
Mesh Type
Cells
Element Type
Coarse
Standard
171131
3D tetrahedral/hexahedral
Moderate
Standard
573635
3D tetrahedral/hexahedral
Fine
Standard
1090381
3D tetrahedral/hexahedral
Table 2: Summary of the meshes used for the independence study
Figure 2 highlights the discretization of the inlet, obtained with the fine standard mesh.
Figure 2: Fine standard mesh created in SimScale, highlighting the discretization of the inlet
Figure 3 will be used as a reference for the definition of the boundary conditions:
Figure 3: Overview of the boundary conditions used in the mean age of air validation case
The exact configuration of the boundary conditions is given in the table below:
Boundary
Boundary Type
Velocity \([m/s]\)
Pressure \([Pa]\)
Turb. kinetic energy \([m^2/s^2]\)
Specific dissipation rate \([1/s]\)
Phase Fraction
Inlet
Custom
1.68 in the x-direction
Zero gradient
Fixed at 0.129735e-2
Fixed at 12.48917
Fixed at 0
Outlet
Custom
Inlet-outlet
Fixed at 0
Zero gradient
Zero gradient
Zero gradient
Walls
Custom
No-slip
Zero gradient
Wall function
Wall function
Zero gradient
Table 3: Summary of the boundary conditions for the present validation case
Model:
\((Sc_{t})\) Turb. Schmidt number = 1
Diffusion coefficients = 1e-9 \(m^2/s\)
Note
The diffusion coefficient is purposedly set to a small number. The objective is to prevent the scalar from spreading in the domain via diffusion effects, which would reduce the accuracy of the local mean age of air.
Passive Scalar Sources
Using Table 1 as a reference, the entire Room volume is defined as a Volumetric passive scalar source, using a cartesian box geometry primitive. Note that, in this simulation, the extrusions of the inlet and outlet are not defined as sources:
Figure 4: Volumetric passive scalar source for a mean age of fluid simulation
Experimental Results
In the experimental tests, Martin et. al\(^1\) first filled the test room with a tracer gas and waited to obtain an even distribution. Afterward, fresh air is released at the inlet, which causes the tracer gas concentration to decay.
A series of gas monitors are used to measure how the concentration of the tracer gas evolves with time. The resulting mean age of air is obtained by calculating the area under the concentration versus time curve.
Note
The theoretical value for the mean age of fluid at the outlet is given by Equation 2: $$Mean\ age\ of\ fluid = \frac {V}{Q} \tag{2}$$ Where \(V\) is the volume of the test environment and \(Q\) is the volumetric flow rate at the inlet. Using the data from the experimental setup in the equation above, we obtain 450 seconds.
On the other hand, the experimental result for the age of air at the outlet was 538 seconds, with a deviation of 6.5%. This discrepancy highlights errors, which are inherent to experimental studies.
Result Comparison
The numerical simulation results for the mixing scalar are compared with experimental data presented by Martin et. al\(^1\). The authors use a dimensionless form of the mean age of air to present their results. In the present validation case, the same methodology is used:
\(\overline{\theta}\) is the local mean age of air (dimensionless)
\(\theta\) is the local mean age of air, in seconds. In the SimScale results, the local mean age is represented by the parameter T1
\(V\) is the volume of the passive scalar source, in \(m^3\)
\(Q\) is the volumetric flow rate at the inlet, in \(m^3/s\)
A comparison of the dimensionless local mean age (LMA) obtained experimentally and with SimScale is presented. The results are assessed over three lines, placed on the symmetry plane of the geometry (y = 1.8 meters). The lines are distant 1.13 m, 2.2 m, and 3.2 m from the inlet, as seen below:
Figure 5: The red dashed lines, placed on the XZ symmetry plane, indicate where the dimensionless local mean age of air is being compared to the experimental data.
To perform a mesh independence study, the results from the three meshes created in SimScale were compared. The results for both moderate and fine meshes were found to be mesh independent. Figure 6 shows the results over the line located 1.13 meters away from the inlet.
Figure 6: Comparison between the experimental data and results from different meshes in SimScale
In the remaining figures, you will find the comparison between the experimental data and the fine mesh results:
Figure 7: Comparison of the mean age of fluid over a line 2.2 meters away from the inlet
Figure 8: Comparison of the mean age of fluid over a line 3.2 meters away from the inlet
In all cases, the SimScale results show the same trends as the experimental values obtained by [1]. Discrepancies are expected, due to the approximations regarding the outlet placement, as well as uncertainties in the experimental results, described in the previous sections.
The figure below shows the mean age of fluid (T1) on the symmetry plane of the geometry. The fresh air coming from the inlet quickly mixes with old air in the room. The mean age of air at the outlet for the fine mesh was found to be 449.97 seconds.
Figure 9: Fine mesh results, showing the mean age of air on the symmetry plane
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
