The aim of this test case is to validate the following functions:
The simulation results of SimScale were compared to the analytical results in [Schaums]. The mesh used in (A) was created with the parametrized-tetrahedralization-tool on the SimScale platform and the mesh used in (B) and (C) was meshed with Salome. Two different simulation setups were made to compare the remote displacement boundary condition with the fixed boundary condition.
The bar has a cross section
of 0.1 x 0.1 m² and a length
= 1.0 m. The point B is located in the middle of edge AC. The same applies to point E and edge DF.
The bar is released from an angle
= 45° and the velocity
of the free end at
= 180° is compared with the analytical solution from [Schaums].
Tool Type : Code_Aster
Analysis Type : Dynamic
Mesh and Element types :
|Case||Mesh type||Number of nodes||Element type|
|(A)||linear tetrahedral||51||3D isoparametric|
|(B)||linear hexahedral||189||3D isoparametric|
|(C)||linear hexahedral||189||3D isoparametric|
= 7870 kg/m³
Constraint Case ‘remote displacement’:
Constraint Case ‘fixed edge’:
= 9.81 m/s²
The equations used to solve the problem are derived in [Schaums]. The constant of integration C is given by equation
. It is then used to calculate the angular velocity of the free end of the bar in equation
. With the angular velocity the magnitude of the velocity can be calculated with equation
= 45° and
= 180° the resulting velocity is
= 7.08803 m/s.
Comparison of the velocity at the free end of the bar obtained with SimScale with the results derived from the equations presented in [Schaums].
|Case||Constraint Case||[Schaums]||SimScale||Error (%)|