Fill out the form to download

Required field
Required field
Not a valid email address
Required field
Required field

Documentation

3D Triaxial Load Primary Creep (NAFEMS Test 11)

This triaxial load primary creep validation case belongs to solid mechanics. This test case aims to validate the following parameters:

  • Creep material behavior.
  • Standard and reduced integration elements.
  • Automatic time stepping.

The simulation results of SimScale were compared to the analytical results derived from [NAFEMS_R27]\(^1\).

Geometry

The geometry consists of a cube with an edge length \(l\) = 0.1 \(m\).

cube geometry triaxial load primary creep validation
Figure 1: Cube geometry for the present validation project

The coordinates for the points in the cube geometry are as tabulated below:

ABCDEFGH
x00.10.1000.10.10
y000.10.1000.10.1
z00000.10.10.10.1
Table 1: Cube dimensions in meters

Analysis Type and Mesh

Tool Type: Code Aster

Analysis Type: Nonlinear static

Mesh and Element Types: The mesh used in cases A and B was created using the standard algorithm within SimScale. The same mesh is used in both cases – the only difference between the runs is the element technology integration. Table 2 shows more details about the cases.

CaseMesh TypeNumber of NodesElement TypeElement Technology
(A)Standard2352nd order tetrahedralStandard
(B)Standard2352nd order tetrahedralReduced integration
Table 2: Mesh characteristics

Find below the mesh used for cases A and B. It’s a standard mesh with second-order tetrahedral cells.

cube second order standard mesh
Figure 2: Second-order standard mesh used for cases A and B.

Simulation Setup

Material:

  • Steel (linear elastic)
    • \(E\) = 200 \(GPa\)
    • \(\nu\) = 0.3
    • \(\rho\) = 7870 \(kg/m³\)
    • Creep formulation: Time hardening
      • \(A\) = 2.6041667e-46 \(1/s\)
      • \(N\) = 5
      • \(M\) = -0.5

Boundary Conditions:

  • Constraints
    • \(d_x\) = 0 on face ADHE;
    • \(d_y\) = 0 on face ABFE;
    • \(d_z\) = 0 on face ABCD.
  • Surface loads
    • \(t_x\) = 300 \(MPa\) on face BCGF;
    • \(t_y\) = 200 \(MPa\) on face CDHG;
    • \(t_z\) = 100 \(MPa\) on face EFGH.

Advanced Automatic Time Stepping:

The following advanced automatic time stepping settings were defined under simulation control:

  • Retime event: field change;
  • Target field component: internal variable V1 (accumulated unelastic strain);
  • Threshold value: 0.0001;
  • Time step calculation type: mixed;
  • Field change target value: 0.00008.

Reference Solution

The equations used to solve the problem are derived in [NAFEMS_R27]\(^1\). As SimScale uses SI units, the reference solution was adopted to a time unit of seconds instead of hours.

$$\epsilon_{xx}^c = – \epsilon_{zz}^c = \frac{0.004218}{60} \sqrt{t} \tag{1}$$

$$\epsilon_{eff}^c = \frac{0.004871}{60} \sqrt{t} \tag{2}$$

$$\epsilon_{yy}^c = 0.0 \tag{3}$$

Result Comparison

Find below a comparison between SimScale’s results and the analytical solution presented in [NAFEMS_R27]\(^1\) for the average creep strain \(\epsilon_{xx}^c\) of the cube. The creep time is 3.6e6 \(s\) (equivalent to 1000 hours).

Case[NAFEMS_R27]SimScaleError (%)
(A)0.1333800.133107-0.205
(B)0.1333800.133107-0.205
Table 3: Comparison of SimScale’s results against an analytical solution for this primary creep validation case

In Figure 3, we can see how \(\epsilon_{xx}^c\), \(\epsilon_{yy}^c\), and \(\epsilon_{zz}^c\) are evolving for case B.

average creep strain plot
Figure 3: Average creep strain plot for case B

\(\epsilon_{yy}^c\) and \(\epsilon_{zz}^c\) also show very good agreement with the analytical solution, having an error of 0% and -0.205%, respectively.

Last updated: July 21st, 2021

Contents
Data Privacy