Electronics Enclosure Design for Better Heat Dissipation

BlogFEAElectronics Enclosure Design for Better Heat Dissipation

electronics enclosure design for thermal management of electronic components and better heat dissipation

Creating a reliable enclosure for heat dissipation in increasingly small electronic products presents engineers and designers with a variety of choices. How is it possible to evaluate the options rapidly, and consequently select the optimal solution to suit the application? The answer lies in engineering simulation.

To illustrate how heat transfer or thermal simulation helps electrical engineers better anticipate the thermal behavior of an electronics enclosure, we hosted a free 30-minute webinar in November 2017. Watch the recording below:

We tested and compared several design variations of a realistic industrial enclosure design of a controller and determined the superior design option for heat dissipation. Watch for free!

Why is Simulation Important?

The need to manufacture safer and more compact electronic devices is challenging engineers across the globe to create extraordinary designs. In the traditional design process, the only way to ensure the durability of a novel electronic product is to perform a high number of design iterations until all criteria are met. This implies a high number of physical prototypes and a time-consuming and expensive physical testing process.

In addition to the number of design iterations, the stage at which design changes need to be implemented is equally important; the earlier in the overall process, the more cost effectively a design change can be realized. The later the stage, the scope of possible design changes narrows drastically, with only small, incremental design modifications possible.

Of course, physical tests cannot (and should not) be entirely eliminated from the product design process. Physical and virtual prototyping are not mutually exclusive—they are complementary. But with computer-aided engineering (CAE) the days, weeks or months of physical testing are replaced with hours or sometimes even minutes of a simulation run.

Why SimScale?

Why aren’t all designers using simulation yet? Several barriers have prevented a more widespread adoption of simulation tools by electrical engineers and designers—and here’s how SimScale is aiming to challenge this status quo:

The Engineering Problem: Improving Heat Dissipation in Electronics

The primary challenge of designing an electronic product is thermal management. The amount of heat produced accumulates within the enclosure, potentially damaging the electronic components. Such overheating not only reduces the life expectancy but can also lead to product failure. This is true for small handheld devices, controllers or heavier outdoor devices. The thermal behavior of such components always needs extra attention from the designer and cannot be neglected.

One of the best approaches a designer can take to overcome this problem is to perform a thermal simulation on the electronics enclosure before the actual product is manufactured. This simulation can help find answers to many critical questions: How effective is the cooling system? What possible design changes need to be implemented? How does the selected material impact the heat transfer behavior? And many more, depending on the nature of your product.

The common design elements aimed at increasing the thermal transfer capabilities of electronics through conduction include [1]:

As is evident, a designer has a lot to choose from. However, it is not easy to determine the right combination of components to ensure reliable and efficient heat dissipation, while keeping the product as compact as possible. The case study below illustrates how simulation can be a handy tool to help you predict the performance of the product and make smart design decisions.

This free infographic illustrates how engineers can develop the best cooling strategy using thermal simulation. Download it for free.

Simulation Project Overview

The purpose of this project is to perform an FEA thermal simulation on an electronics enclosure without the need for conjugate heat transfer analysis. The simulation project “thermal simulation for better electronic enclosure” is part of our public project library and is freely available to view, copy and modify. Three design variations of a realistic industrial enclosure design of a controller are considered:

electronics enclosure design variations with heatsink, copper heatpipe, silicon thermal pads

The above CAD geometries represent a complete assembly of a controller, which includes a printed circuit board (PCB), chips as the heat source, and an enclosure. Design 1 (left) is a basic design with silicon chips and an aluminum enclosure. Design 2 (middle) has a heatsink installed within the system, while Design 3 (left) has a heatsink, a copper heat pipe, and silicon thermal pads. Let’s see how they perform compared to each other.

Simulation Setup

The step-by-step simulation setup is detailed below:

Step 1. A linear transient heat transfer analysis type is selected to compute the temperature distribution and heat flux on the entire body.

Step 2. Tet-dominated element type meshing is used with local mesh refinements. A tet-dominated meshing algorithm is used to mesh the entire geometry. Additionally, local mesh refinements are applied to the areas of interest, such as the contact and small faces. This ensures that the corresponding elements are intact and produce accurate results. The figure below shows the meshed geometry with refinements.

electronics enclosure design meshed geometry with refinements

An automated mesh setting of moderate mesh fineness is applied to the chip volumes and fine mesh fineness is applied to the remaining faces of the body.

Step 3. On completion of the meshing, the points of contact are constrained by using bonded contact conditions between the PCB and chips, chips and heatsinks, and the PCB and enclosures.  Following this, the materials are defined. The material properties pertaining to the following components are shown in the table below with their corresponding density, specific heat, and conductivity.

Component Material Density kg/m3 Specific heat [J/(kg K)] Conductivity [W/(m K)]
PCB FR-4 1850 600 0.3
Chips Silicon 2330 705 0.2
heatsink Copper 8960 385 401
Enclosure Aluminum 2700 897 235


Step 4. The boundary conditions are then set up with a volume heat source applied as a thermal load to the electronic chips and a convective heat flux to the outer surfaces.

Thermal Simulation Results: 95.8% Increase in Heat Dissipation

The temperature and heat flux distribution are visualized for all three cases:

Temperature distribution

temperature distribution for different electronics enclosure design variations with heatsink, copper heatpipe, silicon thermal pads
Design 1. Without heatsink; Design 2. With heatsink; Design 3. With heatsink, copper heat pipe, silicon thermal pads

Heat flux distribution

heat flux for different electronics enclosure design variations with heatsink, copper heatpipe, silicon thermal pads
Design 1. Without heatsink; Design 2. With heatsink; Design 3. With heatsink, copper heat pipe, silicon thermal pads

From the simulation results above, it can be seen that the chips get extremely hot (715 K) in Design 1 due to the absence of heat dissipation material. Heat removal here is mainly due to the aluminum enclosure material and the silicon chips are clearly overheated. At the same time, the heatsink in Design 2 helps remove the heat from the chips. Heat dissipation is 12.6% higher here compared to Design 1 (see the charts below for detailed numerical results).

The addition of highly conductive materials with a low convective heat transfer coefficient (the copper heat pipe in Design 3) increased the heat transfer efficiency drastically. Though thermal interface materials (the silicon thermal pads in Design 3) are expensive, establishing contact layers between the chips and heatsink enhances the thermal coupling between parts and dissipates heat even faster and more efficiently—as a result, heat dissipation is 95.8% (!) higher in Design 3.

thermal simulation for electronic enclosure design simulation results - how to improve cooling and improve heat dissipation

The maximum values of the temperature and heat flux are shown in the table below:

Design Configuration Max temperature (K) Max heat flux (W/m2)
Design 1 Without heatsink 712 1.18e+05
Design 2 With heatsink 355 1.35e+05
Design 3 With heatsink + TIM + heatpipe 346 2.82e+06


Potential further design improvements could be investigated using simulation could be, for example, using an aluminum heatsink, which is cheaper and nearly 60% lighter than copper, or different TIMs with varying thickness. Use this free project template if you are interested in how these design changes would impact the performance.


It is evident that the selection of appropriate components and materials for the conduction of heat in electronics is one of the key design decisions. Copper, for instance, has a thermal conductivity 1.8 times higher than aluminum. The addition of copper heat pipes can also further increase thermal conductivity, far more than copper heatsinks. At the same time, the choice of aluminum can also be justified, since it is cheaper and lighter, increasing the durability and efficiency of the electronic components.Temperature distribution with heatsink

This is just one example of how thermal simulation can help designers or engineers evaluate their design using simulation. The SimScale Public Projects library has a wide selection of simulation templates covering various aspects of electronics simulation and heatsink design, including thermal resistance, energy efficiency, cooling management, and heat dissipation.

Explore them by creating a free Community account or discover the perks of our Professional Plan by signing up for the 14-day trial.

Despite the significant manufacturing cost reduction of electronic boards and prototype enclosures for devices, it is still a daunting and time-consuming task to analyze the thermal performance of a new design. Download this free case study to learn how the thermal performance of a printed circuit board was investigated with SimScale.


  • Davis, Sam. ENGINEERING ESSENTIALS-Shrewd Thermal Management Helps Defeat The Heat-Optimization of thermal controls will significantly enhance electronic system reliability. Electronic Design 55.21 (2007): 41-46
  • Thermal management (electronics), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_management_(electronics)


Back to the Blog