As already mentioned, the NASA Turbulence Modelling Resources (TMR) offer a way to verify and validate the implementation of RANS turbulence models. There is a difference between one and the other:

verificacion refers to the implementation of the models. Verification cases are used to check correct implementation of turbulence models across different solvers by comparing results under similar simulation settings.

validation refers to the solutions. Validation uses experimental data to compare with CFD results within a range of predefined physical conditions.
For this case, the meshes and results avaible at TMR are intended for verification. As Gomez (2014) notes in his Thesis, OpenFOAMâ€™s implementation of the komega SST turbulence model needs for some adjustments in order to make it equal to NASAâ€™s implementation. As it is not possible to modify any of the code in SimScale (for safety reasons), we will just show how some of the results change as mesh resolution increases.
Update: I realized I was using the komega turbulence model (Wilcox, 1988), so I updated the comparison charts accordingly; although NASA provides verification data only for the Wilcox (2006) implementation.
In order to get some additional results to postprocess we make use of function objects and standard utilities. For instance,
foamCalc mag U
generates a new file magU
within each timestep containing the absolute value of the velocity at each cell and at the boundaries. We can then sample for pressure, velocity, and viscosity along a line at x=0.97
with this sampleDict.
Following figure shows the mean velocity profile at different mesh resolutions.
All resolutions get us approximately the same profile; although there are significant differences when we compare our results against those from NASA (remember that NASA uses a different implementation of the komega turbulence model).
On the other hand, the dimensionless eddy viscosity profile shows a strong dependency on the mesh resolution.
If we compare this results with NASAâ€™s, the difference is somewhat bigger.
References
Gomez, Sebastian. 2014. â€śVerification of Statistical Turbulence Models in Aerodynamic Flows.â€ť MSc Thesis, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico. http://repository.unm.edu/handle/1928/24484.
Wilcox, David C. 1988. â€śReassessment of the ScaleDetermining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models.â€ť AIAA Journal 26 (11): 1299â€“1310. doi:10.2514/3.10041.
Wilcox, David C. 2006. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. 3rd ed. La CĂŁnada, Calif: DCW Industries.