Hello there guys, im having a little bit of problem to get a finer mesh with SnappyHexMesh, the error said that i need to alocate more memory to the computer, but im using a 32 core one. The odd thing is that i can manage to produce a very fine AutoSnappyHexMesh, but this one does not fit my requirements.
These levels refer to the octree-refinement approach. This means with each level, one cell is split into 8 cells. So if we make this computation for 9 levels, we end up with:
$$ 1 \cdot 8^9 = 134217728$$
So even if only one cell would be refined to a level of 9, youâd end up with a huge number of cells that can not be handled anymore by a reasonable machine. Therefore, Iâd suggest that you rather start with a max level of 5 or 6 and see if you really need a higher level of refinement.
Another question: What CAD software did you use to create the wing? It looks great - but the many split faces on the surface are odd. It would be nicer if this would be one nurbs face, so the export seems to be split those facesâŚ
On a related note - @Ali_Arafat and @sjoshi put together a very helpful explanation on this meshing operation that you can find in via this link: Meshing in SimScale | Simulation Setup | SimScale That meshing approach can be a bit tricky in the beginning but once the approach is understood, itâs super powerful.
Following @dheiny reply, your maxGlobalCells is set to be 15 million, while the refinement levels will give you more than that. Your blockMesh already returns a size less than one meter and from experience, such a high level of refinement means mega million cells.
Thank you very much for your help!!!
In regard of the level 9 refinement, i have used level 9 refinement before with no problems that is why i tried again. And i used soliworks to create the geometry.
Again thank you for your help, I will keep in touch if it works.
@murillocs - regarding the level 9 refinement: Since you only indicated it as a âMaximum refinementâ level the meshing algorithm can go up to that level of refining but doesnât necessarily do it. So it could be that it worked but it was not refined up to this level.
Regarding using Solidworks: Is the wing-surface in solidworks also split in multiple faces? So can you select there also different faces? Iâm wondering if this splitting is due to the modeling approach behind this wing surface or the STEP export of Solidworks.