# Fp-023c - Front Aero Device Study **URL:** \ **Category:** Project Spotlight\ **Created:** [August 8, 2016, 9:01am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689 "2016-08-08T09:01:16Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 18\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [August 8, 2016, 9:01am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/1 "2016-08-08T09:01:16Z")
![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/9/9dad16c9ce44030fab9b9cba5e26299ee1a793c6.png) ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2016, 5:06am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/17 "2016-09-12T05:06:05Z")
# fp-023c - Front Aero Device Study ### Contents - Introductions - Car - Model - Conditions - Aim of the simulation - Summary of simulation “fp-023b - Front Aero Devices” - Simulations - Front Fender Louvers - Front Fender Stay (Part 1) - Front Fender Stay (Part 2) - S-Duct B - Front Fender Louver C + Louver Stay B - Ride Height Comparison - Conclusion ## Introductions ### Car This car project is my formula style 2-seater car project published in GitHub. > **[GitHub - y-yosuke/formula-ppoino: A side-by-side two-seater car of the early 2000s...](https://github.com/y-yosuke/formula-ppoino)** > > A side-by-side two-seater car of the early 2000s formula style I designed the car in the style of the early 2000s formula cars. The reason it’s a “2-seater” is to allow you to share the joy of riding in a formula car with your friends on the road, it is not only for competition on racing circuits. The prefix “fp” are the initials of “formula-ppoino”. “-ppoino” is a Japanese expression that means “thing(s) looks/sounds/drives like -”, so “formula-ppoino” means it “looks like a formula car”. ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/b/ba2682acd828a5a312d789c4c08d633908fb59e5.png) ### Model I designed the car using the modelling software Rhinoceros. To import multiple faces, the body, front wheels and rear wheels into one geometry, I exported ASCII STL files of each faces from Rhinoceros and edited the names of the solids in these ASCII STL files manually. Then I put these STL files together into the one STL file using “cat” command and uploaded it. The size of the mesh required is at least 9M nodes in this case. It was derived from the result of the simulations in "fp-023b Test-C [https://www.simscale.com/projects/yosukegb4/fp-023b\_test-c/](https://www.simscale.com/projects/yosukegb4/fp-023b_test-c/) ". ### Conditions The conditions of the simulations are in accordance with the state of the car running on public roads. - Inlet velocity, Moving floor speed : 30 m/s (= 108 km/h) - Ride height : Front: 110mm / Rear: 110mm (basically) ### Aim of the simulations Generally, during aerodynamic development of racing cars, you mainly focus on the characteristics below. - Downforce, Drag, L/D - Balance of the front and rear downforces - Sensitivity of the Downforce and Balance to the vehicle ride heights Through simulation, as in "fp-023b Test-C [https://www.simscale.com/projects/yosukegb4/fp-023b\_test-c/](https://www.simscale.com/projects/yosukegb4/fp-023b_test-c/) ", I found there was insufficient front downforce. It depends on the car weight balance and how the vehicle ride heights change, but I provisionaly set a goal to distribute the front and rear downforces of the body to be about 60-65%. ( Clf : Clr = 40-35 : 60-65 ) ### Summary of simulation “fp-023b - Front Aero Devices” I tested some front aero-devices in the simulation "fp-023b - Front Aero Devices [https://www.simscale.com/projects/yosukegb4/fp-023b\_control/](https://www.simscale.com/projects/yosukegb4/fp-023b_control/) ". The following front aero-devices increased the front downforce effectively. These decreased the aerodynamical front lift to almost zero, but the ratio of front-rear downforce was still 96% on the rear axle. - S-Duct at Nose Cone - Front Wing t50 (changed from t40) - Modified Front Inner Fender - Front Flap - Position X+20mm - Angle +7.5deg (mechanical MAX +15deg) Coefficients of the Body and Wheels ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/7/77777472da10174de14078befb80ce607d834d6c.png) - fp-023b Control : Base of “fp-023b - Front Aero Devices” - fp-023c Control : Best result of “fp-023b - Front Aero Devices” ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2016, 11:01am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/19 "2016-09-12T11:01:41Z")
## Simulations ### Front Fender Louvers I found a low pressure area on the upper surface of the front fender. It seemed to generate a lift force like a aircraft wing coupled with the high pressure in the wheel house. So I thought that a louver may be effective for eliminating the pressure difference between the upper and lower surfaces of the front fender. ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/a/a7f91c2d221dafd7807fb3e045b760c4d724b005.png) I tested 3 types of louver below in the simulations. - Fr Fender Louver - Louver at the low pressure area - Fr Fender Louver B - Add 2 slits behind “Fr Fender Louver” - Fr Fender Louver C - Remove the foremost slit of “Fr Fender Louver B”, Add 1 slit behind - Inner wall spread on the lower side The shapes of these louvers are shown below along with the pressure value from the simulations. ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/2/28cd05e77b8200d5585b6d881d939b4f9cc2472a.png) #### Coefficients comparison A table comparing the coefficients obtained from the simulation are shown below. As it shows, “Fr Fender Louver C” is most effective with the biggest front downforce and the small drag increase. Coefficients of the forces on the body and wheels ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/2/20db2607d340be07493e471ac44cdf4f10256494.png) Coefficients of the forces on the body (without wheels) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/b/bf1e0579499d04afb22720cdc15323770ab2c0e0.png) #### Flow through the louver These louvers generate flows from the lower side of front fender to upper as seen in the pictures below. U Magnitude Comparison at Y=-800mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/c/c2e9fbaac7170bc44d098c9c40b914664a4f7392.png) Stream Lines - Front Fender Louver ![17b17deeaf48c1c7dc86f65098bcba276dcebcab](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/3X/4/4/4499f14ce6fe0683d8142d68c6ead641fd1a13ec.jpeg) Stream Lines - Front Fender Louver B ![653e312db62661effdb74e41cf8e8684e0abc291](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/3X/a/d/ade0e3cc2cabcbd6c9ea6e390f15e7eb206b34cf.jpeg) Stream Lines - Front Fender Louver C ![8caca6dbf98082a4847654edef16eb2aaedc107d](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/3X/7/b/7bf35b98010ecee5bdc7528f8a197cca928991a0.jpeg) ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2016, 11:14am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/20 "2016-09-12T11:14:49Z")
### Front Fender Stay (Part 1) I found the front fender stay was installed so as to go against the flow and it seemed to generate a lift force. Therefore I designed other stays that do not inhibit the flow. ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/5/5aec46621630e3b6c5b3b146a9d0f20f81e3c684.png) I tested 2 types of stays below in the simulations. - Stay - Oval Tubes - Stay - Louver The shapes of these stays are shown below along with the pressure value from the simulations. Upper View ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/e/ed94c7ba1a9fa31aee422e181c13b935065032a4.png) Lower View ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/7/7387362cfd9a217877759c2bdf973ceb8666a9e7.png) #### Coefficients comparison The both new 2 stays increase the front downforce. The “Stay - Louver” is less drag than “Stay - Oval Tubes”. Coefficients of the forces on the body and wheels ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/1/19ea0eeaac039977a067ffbd00ae34530a9e46d1.png) Coefficients of the forces on the body (without wheels) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/3/3308b92f2bf01c7c22fe120a05cd9e4afbdf9a5c.png) #### Flow around the stay The comparison figures of “U magnitude” and “Flow Vector” are shown below. The flow of “Stay - Louver” seems smoothest. U Magnitude Comparison at Y=-520mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/8/8234f1872f19041c3b7edf82dc851c4f3e56a59e.png) Flow Vector Comparison at Y=-520mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/a/ac59125a64717749a2e7782d83ba288c79e5024b.png) ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2016, 11:27am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/21 "2016-09-12T11:27:09Z")
### Front Fender Stay (Part 2) From the comparison of the flow vector of the front fender stays, I thought a louver type stay could reduce the drag more. Therefore I designed another louver stay “Louver Stay B”. - Louver Stay B - The angles of the cross sections are a little closer to the horizontal than “Stay - Louver”. The shapes of “Louver Stay B” is shown below along with the pressure value from the simulations. ( Probably these shapes seem almost the same. / “Louver Stay” = “Stay - Louver”) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/b/b9d62480d7b6a93f3c98d47fc820f8ce9aa9af2a.png) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/9/9bb3f0a8fd1456bcc164cd183767a296f5b59e51.png) #### Coefficients comparison The drag and front downforce of “Louver Stay B” are less than those of “Louver Stay”. But I think these differences are too small to be judged. Coefficients of the forces on the body and wheels ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/a/ac86454b8c4bf880b5d8bbf0dbc853e40ac84b4c.png) Coefficients of the forces on the body (without wheels) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/4/4286eead5989dddd12d83e362e0d79d617c47f73.png) #### Flow around the stay The flow of “Louver Stay B” seems smoother a little than that of “Louver Stay”. Flow Vector at Y=-520mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/4/4cd62257b66f49cbcfeabeb666ce9b0651df7013.png) U Magnitude at Y=-520mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/7/71d40038e7b63a10ce9d09bd79e6b7263db83c17.png) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/a/a26116a4df4cbc0dc1c6931ca33e9e77b2c9cbb5.png) #### Conclusion of the front fender stay simulations At this moment, I think “Louver Stay B” is the best for the following reasons. - Lowest drag - Smoothest flow → minimize influences on other parts ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2016, 11:44am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/22 "2016-09-12T11:44:03Z")
### S-Duct B The aero-device “S-Duct” at the nose cone ( simulated in "fp-023b - Front Aero Devices / Simulation - S-Duct : [https://www.simscale.com/projects/yosukegb4/fp-023b\_control/](https://www.simscale.com/projects/yosukegb4/fp-023b_control/) ", the coefficients are shown below ) shifts the rear dowonforce to the front and decreases the drag a little. Coefficients of the forces on the body and wheels ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/c/c25a9a7d7c3abe7825f35b8a26d286effc05e415.png) This “S-Duct” was just one case in the simulation of “fp-023b - Front Aero Devices”. Therefore I would like to see the reactivity due to a different design of the S-Duct. I designed “S-Duct B” that inlet is 150mm forward than the original “S-Duct”. The difference is shown below. Difference between “S-Duct B” and “S-Duct (fp-023c Control)” ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/0/0e919608456699e96a0afad6ee892a490788cb5c.png) #### Coefficients comparison The device “S-Duct B” shifts the front downforce to the rear compared with “S-Duct (fp-023c Control)”. It does not meet the target to distribute the downforce more to the front. Coefficients of the forces on the body and wheels ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/4/48a9a43dbd1b67dd027b298c200a351560d20d79.png) Coefficients of the forces on the body (without wheels) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/8/8f08a789fcc114302279e183369456b524385e77.png) #### Pressure and U Magnitude comparisons Surface Pressure ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/4/4d7ed3f25ee8f72889f856b0e4cb87f0a5fc6935.png) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/3/33224ab0afa95b2fe0c75ccaa04beb7e66227c20.png) Pressure at Y=0mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/4/469d6b5c453bc6a55afc2e3663325fff6d66295c.png) U Magnitude at Y=0mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/9/96158d605d4a3c86ea7c7783a689df04b7a9d9b1.png) ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2016, 11:52am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/23 "2016-09-12T11:52:34Z")
### Front Fender Louver C + Louver Stay B The combination of “Front Fender Louver C” and “Louver Stay B” was simulated. #### Coefficients comparison These increase the downforce without much increasing the drag and distribute the downforce to the front more. Coefficients of the forces on the body and wheels ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/9/993f044408902ead069918192d6bc65602e6f2e2.png) Coefficients of the forces on the body (without wheels) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/d/d6b5264f5822035f0fc8eaa44218ae78cc80d49a.png) ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2016, 12:14pm UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/24 "2016-09-12T12:14:07Z")
### Ride Height Comparison The aero-devices set of the simulations for the ride heights comparison is “fp023c Control + Fr Fender Louver C + Louver Stay B”. The value of “Reference area value [m²]” are the same “0.645” for the all ride height simulations. #### Coefficients comparison The positive rake angle and the lower ride height make more downforce as same as other general formula cars. And the horizontal attitudes and the lower ride height reduce the drag. Coefficients of the forces on the body and wheels ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/d/dce2f91f2b03de98794f2148778fe5d4d4f47842.png) Coefficients of the forces on the body (without wheels) ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/d/df72ea0683edd866fcd3b1725ab7255b9364638d.png) #### Pressure and U Magnitude Comparisons These seem almost the same below, but the differences seen around the edge of the reference plane, on the bottom surfaces of the front wing, between the front fender louver and the front wheel and so on. Pressure on the body and wheels - Bottom View ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/d/d8da8b5b0e7fcba0f861d180005e3969566c2e4d.png) U Magnitude at Y=-1mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/2/29776027dd361165bdc50fe658454d1fce5a5593.png) U Magnitude at Y=-100mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/e/e2053a1e1c4247919a470b37a03efbc0d9af5426.png) U Magnitude at Y=-200mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f2913b9b1b56852d557dd58e9c9e66965af37b4c.png) U Magnitude at Y=-300mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/1/1e794b51e07d31ff547bfa2f94f4826b5de73ac0.png) U Magnitude at Y=-400mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/c/ceaa9442adb87ecff866061d0ba40ae3a4dcdf15.png) U Magnitude at Y=-500mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/1/13d8f9f1c4c4931baee5da57fb4d475a1b70c672.png) U Magnitude at Y=-600mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/0/06c1685291f655bdaf95272752198c166f43aa9e.png) U Magnitude at Y=-700mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/c/c25aa2dfe83b18552b66058a552447283f33eea9.png) U Magnitude at Y=-800mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/e/ec93b9d3270d4f115b259ff1124239dbe3d69990.png) U Magnitude at Y=-900mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/b/b091ba8f17d2aeffdaadfda2aa88b0f19d909223.png) U Magnitude at Y=-1000mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/d/d63f67cb84025d41d5a6749ca9bf1bd55409a594.png) U Magnitude at Y=-1100mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/8/887985530a109f7eb10da95b4edf20f6adb5a454.png) U Magnitude at Y=-1200mm ![](https://www.simscale.com/forum/uploads/default/original/2X/0/088dfc3264da3d668cd56e2a7717820604b072f5.png) ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2016, 5:18am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/25 "2016-09-13T05:18:34Z")
### Conclusion As in the results of “Front Fender Louver C + Louver Stay B” and “Ride Height Comparison”, I achieved the goal to distribute the front and rear downforces of the body to be about 60-65%. ( Clf : Clr = 40-35 : 60-65 ) As a next step, I would like to develop the rear aero-devices as shown below and so on. - Diffuser - Rear Wing - Rear Fender - Rear Bumper ---
**Author:** ![anon18194957](https://www.simscale.com/forum/letter_avatar/anon18194957/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@anon18194957](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/anon18194957)\ **Post date:** [September 14, 2016, 7:33am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/26 "2016-09-14T07:33:12Z")
Definitely worthy of the Project Spotlight, thanks for sharing @yosukegb4! ---
**Author:** ![cjquijano](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/cjquijano/32/24358_2.png) [@cjquijano](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/cjquijano)\ **Post date:** [September 14, 2016, 4:08pm UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/27 "2016-09-14T16:08:21Z")
Hi @yosukegb4, Great analysis! I am more of a structural person so I have a question that is probably pretty basic. I know all of the contour plots came from Simscale but how did you go from these results to the coefficients of the forces on the body and wheels? Does Simscale calculate these? Thanks! Christopher ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [September 15, 2016, 6:34am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/28 "2016-09-15T06:34:28Z")
Hi @cjquijano, Thank you for interested. These coefficients were calclated in SimScale simulation. The function is at “Simulation → Result Control → Force and moment coefficients” in SimScale simulation. > **[Forces and Moments | Result Control | SimScale](https://www.simscale.com/docs/content/simulation/resultControl/OF_forcesMoments.html)** > > In this documentation page, you will find information about how to set up forces and moments result controls in SimScale. Join us today! When you set result controls, you can get coefficient values in “Solver Log” of Simulation Run like shown below. ```auto forces forces00 output: sum of forces: pressure : (191.36126958 -212.379017721 -94.5543844719) viscous : (17.362086193 -1.03766758448 1.22020061593) porous : (0 0 0) sum of moments: pressure : (92.4888905742 40.5730247486 88.3599140732) viscous : (-0.397104898237 9.44665486222 11.446518923) porous : (0 0 0) forceCoeffs forceCoeffs02 output: Cm = 0.0309300065483 Cd = 0.436155655602 Cl = -0.292254122391 Cl(f) = -0.115197054647 Cl(r) = -0.177057067744 forceCoeffs forceCoeffs01 output: Cm = 0.0502949381491 Cd = 0.55616069773 Cl = -0.248696676149 Cl(f) = -0.0740533999252 Cl(r) = -0.174643276223 ``` I copied them and calclated the differences of coefficients using Google Spreadsheet. Best. Yosuke Yamamoto ---
**Author:** ![ahmedhussain18](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/ahmedhussain18/32/140_2.png) [@ahmedhussain18](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/ahmedhussain18)\ **Post date:** [September 15, 2016, 4:27pm UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/29 "2016-09-15T16:27:29Z")
WOW! I am impressed @yosukegb4! Very well done 👍 ---
**Author:** ![1318980](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/1318980/32/9637_2.png) [@1318980](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/1318980)\ **Post date:** [October 9, 2016, 10:20am UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/30 "2016-10-09T10:20:07Z")
Love this project!! Bookmarking this, I’m going to sit down and read it properly later! Kind regards, Darren ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [October 9, 2016, 12:38pm UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/31 "2016-10-09T12:38:22Z")
Thank you! @ahmedhussain18 @1318980 ---
**Author:** ![yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/yosukegb4/32/6366_2.png) [@yosukegb4](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/yosukegb4)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2017, 3:27pm UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/32 "2017-10-23T15:27:26Z")
NEXT : Rear Bodywork Study > [@Fp-023d - Rear Bodywork Study](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023d-rear-bodywork-study/76182): > > I created a new simulation project called '[fp-023d - Rear Bodywork](https://www.simscale.com/projects/yosukegb4/fp-023d_-_control_1/)' CFD Simulations of fp-023d Rear Bodywork More of my public projects can be found [here](https://www.simscale.com/users/yosukegb4/). ---
**Author:** ![jousefm](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/jousefm/32/34908_2.png) [@jousefm](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/jousefm)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2017, 5:13pm UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/33 "2017-10-23T17:13:15Z")
Looking forward to it @yosukegb4! 👍 ---
**Author:** ![jhorv\_th](https://www.simscale.com/forum/user_avatar/www.simscale.com/jhorv_th/32/12874_2.png) [@jhorv\_th](https://www.simscale.com/forum/u/jhorv_th)\ **Post date:** [March 26, 2018, 5:42pm UTC](https://www.simscale.com/forum/t/fp-023c-front-aero-device-study/36689/34 "2018-03-26T17:42:31Z")
Hi @yosukegb4, that is an awesome project! Thanks for sharing! 🙂 Bests, Jani